When Excitement Scares Us: Politics, Identity, and the Right to Disagree

Politics and civil liberties



Politics is kinda wild sometimes. It’s not just about laws or who’s in office, but also about feelings, identity, and the stories people tell about themselves. That really hit me when I watched the MSNBC clip “‘Everyone is excited about her and that scares me’: Female Trump voters on Harris.” The whole vibe of the video felt like people wrestling with change, and honestly I could relate to some of that unease.

One thing that stuck in my head: someone saying they were scared of all the excitement around Harris. Like, excitement is usually seen as positive in politics, right? But here it felt threatening. That made me think about how much politics is about perception, not just facts on paper.

Politics as Storytelling

Yeah, politics is about passing laws and managing budgets, but it’s also about stories. Candidates create narratives about who “we” are, and voters decide if they see themselves in those stories or not. Watching the women in the video, I saw this push and pull. They admired Harris for breaking barriers, but at the same time, they were worried about what that means for them. The question underneath seemed like: if her story wins, does mine lose?

Groupthink Feels Real

I couldn’t help but think about groupthink. You know, when people go along with the crowd just to keep the peace, even if they have doubts. In politics, that shows up when folks are pressured to cheer for whoever everyone else is hyped about. I kinda saw that in the clip. Some women looked like they weren’t comfortable voicing their real thoughts. That’s the danger: if you feel you can’t disagree without getting labeled, then debate dies. And without honest debate, democracy feels weaker.

Civil Liberties & Everyday Life

Civil liberties aren’t just abstract rights in a textbook. They’re the space we have to speak up without fear. In U.S. history, we’ve seen moments where fear shrunk those spaces—think McCarthyism or surveillance after 9/11. The women in the video reminded me of that. If excitement becomes the “rule,” then maybe dissent starts to feel unsafe. That’s kinda scary in itself.

My Takeaway

Honestly, I’ve felt that pressure too, just in smaller ways. In class or with friends, it’s hard to be the one who says something different when everyone else seems on the same page. That’s why I connected to the clip—those women might not always be “right,” but their discomfort matters. Democracy should protect that space for people to say what they feel, even if it’s unpopular.

History Echoes Loud

This isn’t new either. When women fought for voting rights, lots of folks thought it’d break families. When civil rights leaders spoke up, people claimed it’d ruin the “order” of things. Every time change comes, fear tags along. Maybe the same thing’s happening now with Harris. History shows those fears fade, but in the moment, they can shape how people vote and talk.

Conclusion: Liberty Over Fear

So yeah, my reaction was complicated. Excitement around Harris means hope for some, but fear for others. The real challenge is making sure both feelings have room in the conversation. Civil liberties matter not just in courtrooms but in daily life. If someone says “this excitement scares me,” we shouldn’t just roll our eyes—we should ask why. That’s the only way democracy works: letting people disagree without shutting them out.

At the end of the day, democracy isn’t about everyone cheering for the same leader. It’s about everyone being free to think, speak, and even disagree without being afraid.


Tags: politics, civil liberties, groupthink, democracy, op-ed

Comments

Popular posts from this blog